Symbolic Interactionism,
Social Constructivism and the notion of Social Capital … On
the quest for the
right paradigm
The working title for my PhD
research project is
‘Creative Learning Processes of Refugee Children and the
Utilisation of Social
Capital’. Due to the focus on learning processes and the
utilisation of Social
Capital I was not only interested in looking into paradigms which
engage with
the creation of meaning. Thus I was looking into Symbolic
Interactionism and
Social Constructivism. Through my involvement with the Schools and
Social
Capital Network of the Applied Educational Research Scheme (AERS) the
links
between the approaches occurred to me.
Symbolic Interactionism as well
as Social
Constructivism rely on the focus of social environment and social
interactions.
In Symbolic Interactionism the interactions are taking place upon
objects. They
are defined as other human beings and
their categories, guiding
ideas (norms,
values …) as well as daily life situations (Blumer, 1969).
Taking up this
definition social networks thus relations within them, do not only
belong in
the category of objects. Social networks are objects in this sense,
additionally to being the space where these meanings are created at.
Therefore it seems to
be inevitable to explore interlinks of the paradigms of Symbolic
Interactionism,
Social Constructivism and Social Capital.
I set out to explore
this connection because it might help me scaffolding my research in
terms of
data analysis and interpretation.
If meaning is deriving out of
social interactions
within the social environment and Social Capital is creating social
environments as well as inheriting norms, values and regulations there
might be
reciprocity between the concepts.

Ethical
Issues in Research with Asylum Seeker and Refugee children
The
background of this presentation is my PhD project; to explore
creative
learning processes and the impact of Social Capital on refugee
children. The
research is taking place in schools with a high proportion of children
from
asylum seeking or refugee families.
These children are considered as particularly vulnerable. A part of
these
children might be traumatised due to the situation in their home
countries. The
situation within the families can be very stressful and disturbing for
the
children (Avan; Bakshi, 2004).
The
dilemma discussed in above presentation:
Is it ethical to gain consent from the children without consent from
the
parents?
Is it ethical to invovle the parents in the process of consent
considering the
power relations?
What are the legal aspects?
A subsequent presentation held at Children, Young People and Families
Research
Conference in New Lanark (January 2008) had a chang of focus. In
conjunction
with new ethical guidelines and finalising the age group of the
participants as
over 12 years old.
I looked more into general discussion how to do research ethically.
There are difficulties trying insure against all
eventualities. Depending
on different cultural backgrounds of researcher and researched (eg)
behaviour
could be percieved unethical by one but not the other.
Conclusion to this is to ensure that the research process is made clear
at any
point of the research and the participants made aware of their rights.
Their
rights to withdraw at any point and also to withdraw information
already
disclosed when feeling uncomfortable afterwards.
Avan,
Bakshi (2004) My mum is now my
best friend. Asylum-seeker and Refugee Families in Glasgow.
Save the Children. Glasgow
Alderson, Morrow (2004) Ethics, social research and consulting with
children
and young people. Barnado's. Ilford
Lee-Treweek, Linkogle (2000) Danger in the Field: Ethics and Risk in
Social
Research. Routledge. London

Blurbs: No1 Poem about
Research
This
poem is from my research diary when trying to reflect what the actual
problems
at the initial state of the PhD projects were.
Create
creative creativity
In the space of experience
On the stage No. 'School‘
Live lifes, see through eyes, smell with nose, feel with hands
See with hands, smell with eyes, hear through nose
Make things out of dreams
Blow soap bubbles in the air
Rainbow-coloured-bubbles … the sphere of light
Who is I and me and we?
Where to start? Where to end?
Do you know who you are?
Then take a picture, than just in a view…
Moments time you will be … but be
Someone else.
The
first part of the poem is about troubles with British terminology and
finding a
way around it. Experiential Education was the initially planned
approach for
the research project. Most of the field work will take part in school
or school
related environment. The new interpretation of using sense
organs is
reflecting upon the position as a researcher in the sense of travelling
light
and let packages of preconception behind and being able to take
different
positions looking at things from different angles.
The soap bubbles are like ideas occuring during the process of
making the
research into my project. They are about having ideas which at the end
explode
like soap bubbles.
The last part of the research has a lot to do with identities.
Patchwork-identities is one of the concepts I would like to consider.
In
reference to refugee children having to find new roles, new positions
in their
environment. Further it refers to the other children and their
understanding of
themselves, teachers and basically everyone concerned in this
research.
Last but not least I have to question my identity as researcher: who am
I when
I go into the field?
Further taking pictures over a long time period might enable us to see
a
process, to see the narratives more clearly?

Arts
and Education
Experiential
Learning – a possibility for contemporary issues in education?
In contemporary early childhood education issues there is a development
towards
child-centred approaches through which the child becomes autonomous,
reflective
and responsible. (vide e.g. Sting et al.) Yet seeing (children) pupils
as
active learners who become able to use their abilities is not only an
issue in
early childhood education.
Education should be seen as an understanding of the cultural and
civilizing
world of human beings (Girardet, 2004) with communication and language
as
essential bases for inter-subjectivity (Bruner, 2003). The viewing of
play as
an archetype of learning (Petersen, 1931) makes it an important issue,
not only
in early childhood education. Some aspects of play that are significant
for
learning processes in general will be examined.
The method of Experiential Learning has been chosen since it offers a
range of
possibilities to meet the requirements of contemporary issues in
education. It
creates an environment in which pupils are allowed the opportunity to
interact
in real-life contexts, to construct individual meaning and to engage in
complex
actions that reflect outside school. (Weatherley, 2000, p.71) This
requires
differences in the roles of educators and educational institutions as
well as
changes in methods. Methods are explained within the setting of a
German
kindergarten and in the context of an English learning group. Since the
characteristics of learning processes are not dependent on age, the
techniques
can be appropriately adapted to different age groups.
Some methods dealing with experiential learning will be discussed and
experienced. However, a more detailed look at the delivery style will
not be
given now – since distraction initiates learning.
References:
Bruner
(2003) The culture of Education, London: Harvard
University Press.
Girardet
(ed.) (2004) Bildung-Ziele-Wege-Probleme, St. Ingbert: Röhrig
Universitätsverlag.
Petersen
(1931) Der Ursprung der Pädagogik. Berlin: 1931
Sting
et al. (2004) Leitfaden KiTa Bildung. Entwurf. Der sächsische
Bildungsplan – ein Leitfaden für
pädagogische Fachkräfte in Kinderkrippen und
Kindergärten, Dresden:
Technische Universität.
http://www.kita-bildungsserver.de/content/service_downloads.php#kat_80
[Access
20.11.2004]
Weatherley
(2000), Leading the Learning
School,
Stafford:
Network Educational Press.

Abstract
MPhil Dissertation 2005
This
research is concerned with the topic of early years’
professionals’ perceptions
of their occupation in a comparative context of Scotland
and Saxony.
The current discussion about the development of a national curriculum
in
preschool education in Saxony is of contextual relevance as it is the
matter of
the impact and the availability of such a curriculum, as has been the
case in Scotland
for
the past six years.
In detail the tension between theoretical guidelines (law, curricula)
and their
implementation is examined.
There are claimed to be many influences that determine the behaviour of
early
childhood education staff members during the process of becoming
familiar with
the relevant educational theory and its application.
The theory underlying this research is symbolic interactionism, since
it is
concerned with meaning-building. This theory is mainly concerned with
the
interpretations (meanings) and behaviour, for instance, that an
individual
acquires as a result of interaction with the social environment.
Qualitative
research methods were therefore chosen as they are concerned with the
investigation of processes.
Private as well as state pre-school institutions in Saxony and Scotland
took
part in the study. Interviews were held with each head of the
institution and
one of the nursery nurses, or Erzieherinnen, while observations took
place in
the playroom of the nurses previously interviewed.
Some differences in theory and its application between the two
countries were
identified. Whereas it was not possible to figure out what role each
individual’s interpretations had in these differences, some
environmental
influences could nevertheless be defined as being formative.
Two issues that needed further clarification emerged. They were the
different
levels of social capital in both countries as well as the concept of
social,
emotional and personal development.
Some other suggestions such as, for instance, the improvement of
co-operation
with parents surfaced too.
.